The federal indictment of John Bolton, former national security adviser to President Donald Trump, has sparked significant concern and debate. On Thursday, a federal grand jury returned an indictment against Bolton, charging him with 18 counts of unlawfully retaining and transmitting national defense information under the Espionage Act. If convicted, he could face life imprisonment. Bolton has entered a not guilty plea and surrendered at a courthouse in Greenbelt, Maryland, on Friday.
Critics have long called for Bolton to face legal consequences, including potential prosecution at the International Criminal Court. However, the recent indictment has drawn widespread attention, particularly given its implications for the relationship between political power and the justice system. The case comes in the wake of other high-profile indictments, such as that of former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, which critics argue reflect a pattern of using the Department of Justice (DOJ) as a tool against political adversaries.
Bolton, who served in multiple administrations, including those of Presidents Reagan, Bush, and Trump, addressed the charges in a public statement. He claimed that his targeting by the DOJ began after he resigned from the first Trump administration and publicly criticized the president. “Now, I have become the latest target in weaponizing the Justice Department to charge those he deems enemies with charges that were declined before or distort the facts,” he said. He argued that the charges are part of a broader effort to suppress dissent and control narratives about the president’s conduct.
He emphasized the importance of free speech and disagreement in American democracy, stating, “Dissent and disagreement are foundational to America’s constitutional system, and vitally important to our freedom.” Bolton expressed confidence in his ability to defend his actions and expose what he views as abuses of power.
Abbe Lowell, Bolton’s attorney, is also representing other figures targeted by the Trump administration, including New York Attorney General Letitia James and Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook. Lowell defended Bolton’s actions, noting that keeping diaries is a common practice among public officials and not inherently criminal.
Several political groups and legal experts have weighed in on the case. The Not Above the Law coalition connected Bolton’s indictment to previous cases involving Comey and James, suggesting a pattern of politically motivated prosecutions. However, University of Alabama law professor Joyce Vance offered a different perspective. She argued that the indictment against Bolton differs from those against Comey and James, citing the involvement of career prosecutors and a more detailed legal framework. Vance noted that while there may be truth to claims that Trump sought to have Bolton prosecuted, the presence of professional legal oversight may complicate any argument of selective prosecution.
CNN analyst Aaron Blake also highlighted the distinction, pointing to a 2020 court ruling in favor of Bolton in a civil dispute over his book. While Judge Royce Lamberth ruled in his favor, he also criticized Bolton’s handling of classified information.
Meanwhile, Chip Gibbons of Defending Rights & Dissent used the indictment to call for reforms to the Espionage Act. He described Bolton as a “war criminal” and criticized his past rhetoric against whistleblowers and journalists. Gibbons argued that the Espionage Act is overly broad and prone to misuse, particularly when applied to individuals like Manning, Snowden, and Assange. He urged reform to prevent the law from being used to silence dissent and protect national security interests at the expense of civil liberties.
Gibbons emphasized that the current indictment does not provide evidence of intent to harm national security, and therefore, he believes it should not have been brought under the Espionage Act. He called for urgent legislative action to modernize the law and prevent its continued use for politically motivated purposes.
Arabic 
English 