On August 6, 1945, the United States became the first and only nation to use nuclear weapons in warfare by dropping an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later, a second bomb was detonated over Nagasaki. These events marked the culmination of World War II and remain among the most significant and controversial moments in modern history.
The exact number of casualties from the bombings remains contested, but estimates suggest that at least 70,000 people were killed in Hiroshima, with some sources indicating higher figures. In Nagasaki, the death toll is estimated to be at least 40,000. Initially, public support for the bombings in the United States was high, with polls showing that approximately 85 percent of Americans approved of the action in the immediate aftermath.
Despite this early approval, perceptions of the bombings have evolved over time. A recent Pew Research Center poll revealed that American views are now more divided. Nearly a third of respondents believe the use of the bomb was justified, another third feel it was not, and the remainder remain uncertain. Eileen Yam, director of science and society research at Pew, noted that the proportion of Americans who consider the bombings justified has steadily declined over the decades.
Criticism of the bombings emerged almost immediately. Prominent figures such as physicist Albert Einstein and former President Herbert Hoover condemned the attacks as war crimes, highlighting the indiscriminate destruction they caused. Over time, historians have also questioned the primary justification for the bombings—that they were necessary to end the war. Some scholars argue that other factors, including the Soviet Union’s declaration of war on Japan, played a more decisive role in Japan’s surrender.
The legacy of the bombings has been shaped by various cultural and historical accounts. John Hersey’s 1946 article in *The New Yorker*, which detailed the experiences of six Hiroshima survivors, brought widespread attention to the human suffering caused by the bombs. Similarly, the 2023 film *Oppenheimer*, based on Kai Bird’s Pulitzer Prize-winning book *American Prometheus*, reignited public discourse about the ethical implications of the Manhattan Project.
Public perception of the bombings has remained contentious, particularly in the United States. In 1995, plans for an exhibit at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C., sparked controversy when it included perspectives on the civilian impact of the bombings. The exhibit was eventually canceled, reflecting the deep divisions surrounding the topic.
Historians and analysts argue that the debate over the atomic bombings often reflects broader questions about the United States’ global role. Erik Baker, a lecturer at Harvard University, suggests that the narrative of U.S. involvement in World War II has long been used to justify American interventions abroad. However, shifting attitudes, particularly among younger generations, indicate a growing skepticism toward military action.
A 2024 Pew Research Center poll highlighted a generational divide in how Americans view global engagement. Older adults (aged 65 and above) are significantly more likely to support an active U.S. role on the world stage than younger individuals (aged 18 to 35). This trend extends to views on the atomic bombings, with older respondents more inclined to see them as justified.
The 80th anniversary of the Hiroshima bombing coincides with renewed concerns about nuclear weapons. Recent geopolitical tensions, including conflicts between India and Pakistan, the war in Ukraine, and U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, have heightened fears of nuclear escalation. Former President Donald Trump, during his 2024 re-election campaign, warned of the possibility of “World War III,” emphasizing the persistent threat of nuclear conflict.
Experts warn that the continued reliance on nuclear deterrence risks encouraging other nations to pursue nuclear capabilities. Seth Shelden, a representative of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, argues that the focus should shift from whether nuclear deterrence can work to whether it can sustain peace indefinitely.
As the world commemorates the 80th anniversary of the Hiroshima bombings, advocates hope that evolving public opinion will inspire efforts to reduce nuclear arsenals and promote global disarmament. The ongoing debate underscores the enduring moral and strategic complexities of nuclear power in international affairs.
English 
Arabic 